Lady Trouble

Three of the WTA's most powerful stars suffered significant setbacks (well that was a lot of Ss!) today.

Maria Sharapova and Amelie Mauresmo both lost their opening matches in Moscow. Sharapova hadn't played since the US Open. Mauresmo, who skipped the year's last major, has now lost 3 of 4 matches in her comeback from a break from the tour.

Jelena Jankovic also lost on Wednesday, retiring due to heat troubles after splitting sets with Chinese player Yan Zi.

Meanwhile, Tommy Haas, Fernando Gonzalez, Andy Murray and my favorite Canadian, Frank Dancevic all recorded wins in various ATP events.

The Break

James Blake took one (though, not on purpose) and Amelie Mauresmo seems to be on one of her own. Should players take it into their own hands on deciding when their personal off season is?

Three years ago, after the death of his father and struggling with an injury and a debilitating illness, James Blake took a break from tennis he didn't realize he needed. He played just five matches in the span of six months while re-cooperating physically and more importantly, emotionally.

When he returned to the tour, Blake worked his way back up the rankings (he had fallen to #210) and won two titles in New Haven and Stockholm and played that epic US Open quarterfinal match against Andre Agassi.

He felt fresh.
James Blake at the 2005 US Open (photo by Chance98 via flickr).

Yet as both tour work out the kinks in their respective tour schedules (ATP WTA) tournaments on all sides of the world all having the same problem: players pulling out due to injury (and fatigue and stress and illness and 'personal issues' and inflammation and infections...okay, you get the idea).

This week at Stanford, long a tournament adored by players such as Venus Williams, Lindsay Davenport, Monica Seles, Kim Clijsters, Justine Henin, Jennifer Capriati and others, this year features none of those players; the top two seeds are Anna Chakvetadze and Marion Bartoli.

And the Acura Classic next week in San Diego already has received withdrawal notices from Henin (wrist injury), Nicole Vaidisova (viral infection) Serena Williams and Ana Ivanovic.

While many players struggle week-by-week to play through their pain (whether it be physical or mental) Amelie Mauresmo has had enough - at least temporarily.

After her breakthrough Slam season in 2006 in which she won both the Australian Open and Wimbledon, Mauresmo was just 8-3 in the majors this year, giving up both her crowns along the way. So the Frenchwoman has taken matters into her own hands at the start of the second half of the 2007 season: she's taking a holiday.

While Mauresmo is off "charging her batteries" (she may even miss the US Open), men's and women's tournaments alike will continue to deal with withdrawals, defaults and retirements due to over-worked players. But as Blake and Mauresmo have found, maybe the answer is to take control of your own schedule, not let the tour schedule you.

A Hushed Crowd

This picture is from Wimbledon 2006. But I believe it tells us the story of the game in England. The respect the fans have for it.

Not a single seat empty. Not an outlandish fan in the crowd.

Refreshing.

Au Revoir, Amelie

Though Amelie Mauresmo was a superb 22-2 in majors last year, the Frenchwoman couldn't keep her much-anticipated title defense alive on Sunday against up-and-comer Lucie Safarova. The teen dominated Mauresmo in their 6-4, 6-3 affair on Rod Laver arena, vaulting the 70th-ranked Safarova into the quarters.

And for Mauresmo, it's good bye and good luck. Her next stab at a major? The French, in May. I feel as though the demons she seemed so sure to be rid of last year may be creeping back in: her usual delirious performance in Paris and another pressure-filled title defense in London.

Can the girl find her game again?

Season Oh Seven Is Upon Us

Coming out of the holiday season always means one thing for the general public: trim down and shape up. Whether it's weight we've gained through Christmas cookies or excessive eggnog, we are all hoping to shed some of our winter extras through a variety of New Year's pledges that most of the time never tend to stick around. Going to the gym today certainly put that truth on display for me. Every cardio machine was taken, and while I am never one to be impatient, I didn't feel like it was fair that I (a hard-working eliptical user) had to wait while a young woman in green dress pants chatted away on her cell phone and skimmed through the pages of Vanity Fair while I waited.

This time of year means something completely different for the touring tennis players of the WTA and ATP tours. While they don't have to stand in any such cardio lines waiting for Miss Social to finish her conversation slash "workout", the pros of the men's and women's tours should have already put in their time at the gym. Following their respective tour ending tournaments (usually in early/mid November) players take a vacation for a week or two before hitting the weights and running their sprint drills to get in top form for the year's most grueling grand slam.

The Australian Open has always been - to me - the most difficult slam for this reason alone. Coming out of the off season, players not only need to be able to shake off their early-season rust but also must be in great shape to win seven straight matches in the mid-summer heat of Melbourne. Look at what the past has proven: Agassi, Capriati, Henin-Hardenne and Federer are all players that took not only their tennis but their fitness seriously and reaped the benefits of an early-year slam victory.

So true is this statement in 2007. Global warming is no joke my friends; our friends Down Under are in for some serious heat on the court. Here's a look at my top prospects on both the men's and women's side of the draw:

Men
Roger Federer (SUI) - The three-slam sultan from 06 is back this year for the piece of history he is yet to claim: The Grand Slam. Federer conquered everything but the clay last year and barring any sort of Murray in Montreal repeats, the Fed has a legitimate shot. He won the season-ending championships with ease following his three-set match-points down win over Roddick in the round robin and consistently arrives in Australia in top condition both physically and mentally. The thing I love about Fed is how cool and calm he is: he understands that his time off is important and uses it not only to rest his batteries, but to recharge them.

Rafael Nadal (ESP) - The two-time French champ needs to start to figure his game out off the clay in order to continue what has been an impressive rivalry with Federer the past two years. Following his loss to Fed in the finals at Wimbledon, Rafa had a poor summer hardcourt season that ended with a quarterfinal loss to Youzhny at the Open. The fall didn't treat our ferocious Spaniard friend much better, he didn't reach a final in three Masters Series events and lost in straights to Fed to end an extremely average (minus Rome and Paris) year. The thing I love about Nadal is his ability to bounce back, both physically and mentally. Look for him to show up in Melbourne with biceps bulging and hungry for his first non-clay slam title.

James Blake (USA) - The sentimental favorite of 2006 could become the odds makers favorite of 2007. James Blake has consistently gotten stronger since his disastrous 2004 when he lost his father, fell ill to shingles and suffered a broken bone. 2006 saw this former Yale student stand up to the big guns with his huge forehand and beautiful backhand. His performance at the season ending championships (a round robin win over Nadal and runner-up to Federer) is one reason why I see 07 being such a good year for Blake, but it's also his commitment to his fitness and overall health. I got to see Blake up close at a movie theatre in Manhattan and you can tell this guy is a real athlete, smooth and agile. If he can stand the Australian heat, I see him going far.

Women
Amelie Mauresmo (FRA) - The most intriguing story of the women's tour in 2006 (over Martina Hingis' comeback) was Mauresmo and her defeat of the Choke Demon. Her storyline couldn't have been more ironic: the girl who always came up short, never won the big one...on the brink of slam greatness at the Australian and both her semifinal and final opponents retire before she can conquer the thing that has haunted her for so long. How much sweeter Melbourne made London in this case. Mauresmo had a stellar year, winning two slams, playing the "match of the year" against Henin in the Wimbledon final and steering through the latter part of the season with still as much courage and motivation as she did prior to her grand slam glory. Maybe she can rekindle some of her Melbourne magic from 99 and 06 to add a third title to her case.

Kim Clijsters (BEL) - I can't help but be frustrated slash angry with Kim Clijsters. Retiring? Retiring? Didn't she pay any attention to the Martina Hingis Comeback Tour? Hasn't she the brain power to figure out a schedule that will take less toll on her body but still employ her as a part-time WTA champion? I guess not. And that's why Clijsters turned down an offer from the Belgium tennis federation to represent the country in the 2008 olympics. Though Clijsters motivations remain mysterious to me (Children?!? Marriage?!?) I don't see her doing much in 2007. She had a mediocre finish to 06, but certainly was handicapped by a lack of match play at the end of the year. Will she wilt away into tennis could-have-beens? Or will Clijsters go out without the one-slam wonder tag attached to her name? I pick the former. Yet she's always fared well in Australia...

Alicia Molik (AUS) - My Martina Hingis of 2007. Alicia Molik spent much of last year on the challenger circuit, taking wild cards into main events, losing often and training hard. Though the second half of 06 was technically her comeback, I expect to see the former Australian Open quarterfinalist in full force at this year's tournament. Remember 05? The Aussie fans were loving this girl. She drilled Venus in straights in the Round of 16 inside Laver before stretching Davenport to an epic 9-7 in the third match that could've gone either way. With her ear infection (nasty thing, huh?) seemingly completely shaken, I like this wild card going far in the draw.